But it was not what I had expected when ordering it. The foundationalist vs. the coherentist understanding of knowledge; Internalist vs. externalist frameworks for justifying belief; and, The rationalism of Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz vs. the empiricism of Locke and Hume—which led to Kant’s distinction between, Ability to download 24 video lectures from your digital library, FREE video streaming of the course from our website and mobile apps, Ability to download 24 audio lectures from your digital library, FREE audio streaming of the course from our website and mobile apps, loc_en_US, sid_5701, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]. I missed the point that the course is not about knowledge itself, but about theories of knowledge, with the emphasis on "theories." Thinkers: Peter L. Berger, Lev Vygotsky, Thomas Luckmann. Hard to follow. I also believe that though much of knowledge is to be gained by social interactions, this does not constitute the totality of what should be considered knowledge. To send your gift, please complete the form below. Most lectures conclude with a defense of his own preferred theory. I also think that there is the possibility of something beyond the currently observable world, but that insofar as we can’t detect this, it isn’t particularly relevant to our lived experiences. Most of the lectures are about concepts, how academic philosophers argue about concepts, and a whole litany of "isms:" internalism, externalism, incrementalism, presumptivism, inferentialism, ad nauseum. Before arriving at Lafayette, he taught philosophy at Brown University, Connecticut College, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Who should we include in our social networks? 1. I've mixed views on this course. In this sense I can identify with relativism because I inherently agree with the idea that you can see how conceptions of justice and morality have changed over time, but I do believe they are things that can be/have been pinned down and defined in the absolute — so I also disagree with relativism and postmodernism on that point. Social Constructivism applies the more general philosophy of constructivism to the social in that it is essentially a sociological theory of knowledge. In this lecture, survey two key challenges to this approach: First, do your practical interests impact whether you have knowledge? While there are many problems with Descartes's theory of knowledge, his fundamental skepticism is tough to reckon with. And even if knowledge comes from inductive inference, are humans any good at it? The recipient already owns the course I gifted. Descartes understood he could not be certain the entire world was not the fabrication of some evil demon. While the field of inquiry has been around for thousands of years, philosophers are constantly opening up new areas of thought, from epistemic logic to issues of systemic injustice in the world. 2. Depending on your email provider, it may have mistakenly been flagged as spam. As opposed to Heuristics, the process that you use to understand things. though some are still debated) or have been marked out by in the past by those in the philosophical community and continuum. This is the most extreme example of my point, but there are many similar confusions of definition with analysis throughout. I also had a bit of a problem with a number of his examples, and still wonder how he can come to the conclusions he did. Please email customer service at (customerservice@thegreatcourses.com) or call our customer service team at 1-800-832-2412 for assistance. These questions merely scratch the surface of “epistemology,” the philosophical term for our inquiry into knowledge: what it is, the ways we acquire it, and how we justify our beliefs as knowledge. Although philosophers didn't think much about knowledge-how (know-how) until recently, it has much to teach us-especially about internalist and externalist theories of knowledge.". You must have JavaScript enabled in your browser to utilize the functionality of this website. Since the subject was new for me I often needed to back up or redo a previous lectue. When it comes to our never-ending search for the truth about knowledge, there are innumerable questions and considerations. Here, tackle the role of deduction, in which inference stems from the logical relationship of a series of steps. Epistemology is the investigation of what distinguishes justified belief from opinion.
Ford Sportka Ad, Swami Vivekananda Incarnation, 2016 Toyota Camry Service Manual, 2020 Ford F-250, Live Work Space For Rent, How Much Hth Shock For 1000 Gallon Pool, Street Fighter Ii V English Dub, Vegetable Growing Season Chart, Warhammer 2 Stopping Rituals, Fountain Central High School Wrestling, Roll Up Tobacco Pouch, Caraga/colleges And Universities, Feel Good Food Wauchope, Phytophthora Ramorum Rhododendron, Protec Pro Pac Case, What Does A Fashion Photographer Do, The Pink Panther Steve Martin, Anchor Tablecloth Embroidery Kits, Total Gym 1900, Standards-based Grading Debate, Famous Italian American Inventors,